Participants felt the excuse-giver was less trustworthy when they provided a date (vs. money) excuse (M_time = 4.23, SD = 1.53; M_money = 5.35, SD = 1.24), F(1, 449) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .15. Participants also felt the excuse-giver was less trustworthy when they provided an excuse in response to consumption in the distant (vs. close) future (M_near = 5.06, SD = 1.34; M_{distant_coming} = 4.51, SD = 1.60), F(1, 449) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .05. These main effects were qualified by a significant interaction, F(1, 449) = 3.68, p = .05, ? 2 = .01. Planned comparisons showed that when a money excuse was provided in response to an invitation for near and future consumption, there was a significant difference in perceived trustworthiness (M_near = 5.54, SD = 1.10; M_{distant_future} = 5.19, SD = 1.33); F(1, 449) = 3.78, p = .05, ? 2 = .01. However, a time excuse was perceived as much less trustworthy in response to an invitation for future (vs. near) consumption (M_near = 4.63, SD = 1.40; M_{distant_future} = 3.79, SD = 1.56); F(1, 449) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .05.

Moderated mediation

We examined getting moderated serial mediation following Process (Hayes, 2015 ) model 85. Inside design, i evaluated if the effectation of justification kind of on feelings out-of interpersonal intimacy is serially mediated from the thinking off controllability of your own financial support plus the after that trustworthiness of new reason. We also examined whether this serial mediation impact are moderated by the whether the practices are occurring throughout the near or distant upcoming. The general design is high (? = .09, 95% CI: .01 so you’re able to .19), and this ideal moderated serial mediation. Far more specifically, the outcome of your study revealed that, because serial mediation consequences were extreme both for close and you may distant-upcoming usage, the new indirect outcomes were more powerful for distant coming (? = .23, 95% CI: .thirteen to .36) compared to close-coming consumption (? = .fourteen, 95% CI: .07 to help you .23). Continue reading “Investigation 4: Asymmetry from inside the Attitudes out-of Justification-Givers and Receivers”